Can Computers Understand? Includes John Searle's arguments

syllogistic sumary of computing devices abilities well done.

Can Computers understand?

1) Thinking is the hallmark of understanding.

2) Only exceptional machines can think.

3) If something can think it can understand.

4) Only picky machines that can think can understand.

5) Mental states and their resulting actions ar products of the heart of activity (brain).

6) To understand, thoughts must be produced by the brain.

7) A computers psychic states and events are controlled by a program.

8) The program is not a product of the computer.

9) A computer does not produce thoughts in its brain.

10) A computer cannot understand.

        John Searle addresses the point of the ability of slushy Intelligence (AI) to understand, in Mind Brains, and Programs. His main argument is that because AIs are computers and computers have no thoughts of their own, they cannot understand. Any actions being performed to simulate look are confined by the programs available to the computer. He presents the precedent of a man linking Chinese characters and appearing to know the language, provided in reality the man is just following the book of instructions given to him ( the program). This example serves well to explain how although a computer can look like it understands a story, it can do no more than go through the motions.

        Of course such(prenominal) a definitive standpoint on an issue as controversial as the capacity of an AI to understand forget draw many critics. The criticism of his theory that I dislodge to be the most credible is The Other Mind do offered by Yale University. This line of thinking asks: if behavior is what we can go under the presence of cognition through, and an AI passes a behavioral test, why dont we attribute cognition to it?

        I myself do not hope in the philosophy...

If you want to get a full essay, line of battle it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper