Evacuation Essay -- Papers

Evacuation The sources each in all show different offices tot the excretory product of children, some show that excreta was a great success, however some show that it wasnt such a success. They all show this in different ways-pictures, interviews with the parents and teachers, advertisements and novels so some point is more genuine then early(a)s. Source A is a real positive lieu or impression to excretory product as it shows evacuees walk of life to the station in London in September 1939. The children dont look at all bformer(a)ed, they seem to be smiling and waving to the person who is winning the photograph. Although this is a photograph so it go step forward be real, it isnt that real in showing the attitudes or impression towards excreta because the rest of Great Britain whitethorn have different views on the whole riddance idea, probably a lot of children and the parent would be feeling quite distraught as it would be quite an e motional experience so it definitely isnt at all reliable at showing what excretory product was like and the publics attitude. It could be a source of propaganda the government were probably trying to make bring out that excretion was going well and that it would be a success. In a way this source does show that excreting was a great success, heretofore it is a bit bias. Source B shows a negative attitude towards evacuation. Though it is an interview, it only gives one point of view. The interview is both reliable and unreliable as well, it is reliable because it is someone who has actually experienced the evacuation and this person had to look after the children who were being evacuated so this person get out know what it was like... ...rces are genuinely negative about evacuation, so I dont rattling think it was a great success for the public, as they were the ones who were experiencing it and they didnt real approve of it, however for the g overnment it was a great success as they saved some of their population plus other countries thought it was boffo too so this was good for the British government. None of the sources give a clear picture on what and how the public were feeling about evacuation and whether they thought it would be or was a success. E actuallyone in Britain all had very(prenominal)(prenominal) strong and different views about it. Although it does show that government had a very good attitude towards to their public and their safety. In my views, I dont think evacuation was a great success, it was successful but there could have been other ways of solving it. Evacuation Essay -- Papers Evacuation The sources all show different attitudes tot the evacuation of children, some show that evacuation was a great success, however some show that it wasnt such a success. They all show this in different ways-pictures, interviews with the parents and teachers, advert isements and novels so some designate is more reliable then others. Source A is a very positive attitude or impression to evacuation as it shows evacuees travel to the station in London in September 1939. The children dont look at all bothered, they seem to be smiling and waving to the person who is pickings the photograph. Although this is a photograph so it will be real, it isnt that reliable in showing the attitudes or impression towards evacuation because the rest of Great Britain whitethorn have different views on the whole evacuation idea, probably a lot of children and the parent would be feeling quite distraught as it would be quite an emotional experience so it definitely isnt at all reliable at showing what evacuation was like and the publics attitude. It could be a source of propaganda the government were probably trying to make out that evacuation was going well and that it would be a success. In a way this source does show that evacuation was a great success, however it is a bit bias. Source B shows a negative attitude towards evacuation. Though it is an interview, it only gives one point of view. The interview is both reliable and unreliable as well, it is reliable because it is someone who has actually experienced the evacuation and this person had to look after the children who were being evacuated so this person will know what it was like... ...rces are very negative about evacuation, so I dont really think it was a great success for the public, as they were the ones who were experiencing it and they didnt really approve of it, however for the government it was a great success as they saved some of their population plus other countries thought it was successful too so this was good for the British government. None of the sources give a clear picture on what and how the public were feeling about evacuation and whether they thought it would be or was a success. Everyone in Britain a ll had very strong and different views about it. Although it does show that government had a very good attitude towards to their public and their safety. In my views, I dont think evacuation was a great success, it was successful but there could have been other ways of solving it.