Social Structure Of Mesopotamians And Egyptians History Essay

Social Structure Of Mesopotamians And Egyptians History EssayThe companion up to(p) structure from peerless empire to another can vary a lot. It depended mostly on the wealth of the empire, the way the empire came to be, and other factors. In the case of the Mesopotamians and Egyptians, there were some similarities, but besides some differences. Those differences included the friendly roles that women compete in their respective empires, among other things.The Mesopotamian Empire had galore(postnominal) opportunities to accumulate wealth. Thus, their accessible structure became much more clearly defined than other neolithic communities. In early Mesopotamia, the rule set consisted of kings and nobles who previously were great warriors. later on on, however, royal status became hereditary. The royal part was looked upon heightsly, and people often view of them as part divine. Next in the affable chain were the priests and priestesses, many of whom were related to the pr inciples in some way. Their main responsibility was to intervene with the gods and realise good fortune for their communities. In exchange for this service, priests and priestesses led a indulgent life. Also in the social structure were free commoners. They mostly worked as farmers in the countryside or in other manufacturing jobs. Dependent clients were another class in the social structure. They possessed no property and usually worked as agricultural laborers. The last rung on the social ladder were slaves. Slaves came from threesome main sources prisoners of war, convicted criminals, and people who sold themselves into slavery in order to fulfill their obligations. Most slaves were domestic servants in wealthy households, but some worked as agricultural laborers as well.The Egyptian social structure had some similarities and differences. handle the Mesopotamians, Egyptians had a well-defined social class corpse. Also, the Egyptian peasants and slaves played a similar role in society as the Mesopotamian peasants and slaves. However, the organization of the ruling classes differed significantly. While Mesopotamians had a series of urban kings, Egyptians had one supreme, central ruler called the pharaoh. The Egyptians had no need for nobles since the pharaoh was the absolute ruler. Instead, Egyptians relied on professional military forces and political sympathies officials. This allowed for individuals of common birth to surrender a higher likelihood of attaining high positions compared to Mesopotamians. The differences between the social classes of the Egyptians and Mesopotamians allowed each of them to have their own unique empires.The conditions of women were also very different between the Mesopotamians and the Egyptians. In Mesopotamia, women had subordinate legal status. However, they did have a certain amount of influence politically, economically, and socially. At ruling courts in Mesopotamia, women sometimes advised the government. Other held great power as high-ranking priestesses. Other Mesopotamian women were able to receive a formal education and come a career. Unfortunately, Mesopotamian men began to progressively tighten their control over the social and sexual behavior of women in the second millennium B.C.E. Egyptian women were able to have an even bigger impact on society. There was a time when a woman pharaoh took power (Queen Hatshepsut). Other women also had hard amounts of power as priestesses. Some got formal educations as well.The Mesopotamian and Egyptian social structures had both differences and similarities. Both empires social systems were well-defined, and included similar roles for peasants and slaves. However, the rest of their system was somewhat different, especially their ruling classes. Though both gave women some social influence, Egyptians provided more powerful opportunities for women. Both empires had a successful and well-enforced social class system.