'If I Die in a Combat Zone\r'

'The novels If I go out in a Combat district and The Things They Carried were twain written by Tim O’Brien. Tim O’Brien is a Vietnam War warhorse and all of the novels he wrote argon slightly his measure in the war. He includes the uniform characters in the stories, but changed their names and descriptions. I do not believe that O’Brien wrote the books for any political intellect. both of the novels put up truly much in reciprocal including the style that it is written, and the stories that atomic number 18 told. There atomic number 18 also differences including the order of the stories, and the endings.These similarities and differences are all distinguished(predicate) for the novels because it shows the diversity that different soldiers go through with(predicate) in times of war. The style that O’Brien writes in both novels is first gear someone narrative. O’Brien posits the accounting in his situation of view, and tells diffe rent stories. In If I recrudesce in a Combat partition off the stories he tells his whole time in Vietnam. He starts with how he got drafted into the war and his training. He considered exit the country to go bide in Europe. At the last little he almost left, but so decided to stay and go to Vietnam.He continues the taradiddle in chronological order of the times and signifi gitt events that had happened throughout his duty. In The Things They Carried, O’Brien told significant stories that were told out of chronological order. The stories told in The Things They Carried were also less biographical and think more on the men in his platoon. He also jumps O.K. and forrard between the war and post war, where he talked to the surviving men from his platoon. He tells the stories of the war, and the stories that the men told him. This is one of the differences between the two books.The slipway the stories are told are different. Even though both books are told in the opi nion of O’Brien, when he is telling the stories in The Things They Carried, we are more sympathetic to the other characters because it mostly focuses on them. In both of the stories, O’Brien also uses the same voice communication in the books. He uses what I outline as â€Å"war” terminology. He uses talking to and acronyms. For example he said that they were expression for Charlie. I’m not very educated on the Vietnam War so I looked up who Charlie was. Then I cognize that Charlie is the Vietnamese army.There were other ground including the different guns and different mine types. Thankfully, O’Brien explained those terms. O’Brien is consistent with his terms and it makes it easier to engage one book after study the other because of this consistency. The endings of If I Die in a Combat Zone and The Things They Carried are different. In If I Die in a Combat Zone, the end is O’Brien going home from Vietnam. He says that there is no joy in leaving Vietnam. He says that he thought of the friends he gained and the friends he lost. He reminisced what he learned, and realized that he did not learn a lot.The ending of The Things They Carried is one last story that focused on O’Brien. It was the first time that he had seen a assassinated body in Vietnam. It then flashes back to his past where his girlfriend had died because of a disposition tumor. That was the first time he had seen a dead body. The soldiers say that to keep a person alive is to always tell memories. But O’Brien didn’t do that, he just imagined that his girlfriend was quench alive and waiting for him. Although collectively I did not like either of Tim O’Brien’s books, but I can say that they are well written.The reason I did not like the books was because of the artistic creation that were described. I understand that learning approximately the Vietnam War is important, and the horrific aspects are impor tant to learn also, but I do not agree with describing in dilate about bodies being blown to pieces. Both books have their similarities in being that they are about the Vietnam War, the style of the book, and the stories and their content. Although the differences were big, including the order of the stories, and the vista of the stories, the books are close in content. I believe that these books can be take in simultaneously with each other.\r\n'